Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability

Subject:

From:

Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>

To:

Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>

Date:

Sat, 10 May 2014 12:03:49 +0200

Good morning Dan!,

El 10/05/2014, a las 00:48, Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org> escribió:

Really: does your requirement really need HA of this level?

Would it not be sufficient to accept that if stuff goes down, what you have is what you have?

--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org

It’s not something my implementation has been required to have… but I like thinking and designing platforms granting you the possibility

of later scaling, having de possibility to improve them and of course protecting one's neck :)

Thank you so much!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian packages, jltallon

Next by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula on Debian, Sergio Gelato

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability, Dan Langille

Next by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability, Josh Fisher

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]