Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability

2014-05-07 06:15:39
Subject: [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability
From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:12:21 +0200
Good morning,

Have been thinking in how could be setup a bacula infrastructure with HA. You 
could for example if you use Postgres or Mysql the databases replicate the 
servers through it’s own replication protocol and will be up to date. For
backing up pools you could always something like ZFS replication, DRBD or 
whatever…. but, now… Imagine the following situation : 

- Bacula infrastructure A goes down…
- Bacula infrastructure B is up and replicated from A…. but : 

- The database could be after or before the status of the tapes in the pool… 
(talking about File Storage)
- The same for the pools and pool’s tapes repesct to the database….

How does bacula manage this situations?. I mean… Is there any possible way of 
ensuring the replicated content (the combination of both the database and 
pool’s tapes) is reliable for using it in case of disaster?. How else is this
advised to be done?.

Best regards,


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>