Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Backing up catalog into a Pool defeats the purpose?

2013-11-25 19:23:03
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Backing up catalog into a Pool defeats the purpose?
From: Mark <bacula-list AT nerdish DOT us>
To: bacula-users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:11:26 -0600
Hello,

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, jackbroni <bacula-forum AT backupcentral DOT com> wrote:
Doesn't backing up the catalog into a Bacula Pool of volumes defeat the purpose as it would be inconvenient to retrieve the catalog in the case of failure?


Yes, it certainly could be.  You'll notice the default RunAfter job for the catalog backup just deletes the resulting db dump after it has been backed up.  An easy change is to replace it with your own RunAfter script that copies that db dump and your various other files (configs, bootstraps, whatever will simplify a rebuild) away to another host.  Offsite, preferably.

HTH,
Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users