Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Backing up catalog into a Pool defeats the purpose?

2013-11-25 18:23:14
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Backing up catalog into a Pool defeats the purpose?
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Bacula Users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:19:53 -0500
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:37 PM, jackbroni
<bacula-forum AT backupcentral DOT com> wrote:
> Doesn't backing up the catalog into a Bacula Pool of volumes defeat the 
> purpose as it would be inconvenient to retrieve the catalog in the case of 
> failure?
>
> Sure it could be useful to have a catalog snapshow, but in the event of 
> failure perhaps it would be useful to store just a synced version of the 
> catalog in a different location.

I put catalog backup in a catalog pool that has 2GB (or so) disk based
volumes so in my case at max 2 catalog backups will be on a single
volume. I guess I could also have done a use volume once but in my 10+
years of using bacula I have only needed to recover the catalog 1
time.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users