Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Reducing the maximum number of volumes in a pool

2013-02-27 08:16:45
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Reducing the maximum number of volumes in a pool
From: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
To: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>, Bacula Users Mailing List <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:11:44 -0500
On 2013-02-27 03:57, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to save a bit of disk space by reducing the number of
> volumes in the "incremental" pool (we use separate pools for for full
> and incremental backups for each client, bacula 5.2.13 compiled from
> source). Previously we had 15 incremental volumes per pool, now I'd
> like to retain 7 for each client.
>
> I've changed all the pool definitions in the director config from
>
> Maximum Volumes = 15
>
> to
>
> Maximum Volumes = 7
>
> for the incremental pools, but following an "update pool from
> resource" the db record still shows the previous number of volumes in
> the pool for Max, not the one defined in the director config.
>
> Any idea why this would happen or how to fix it, short of writing 
> some
> custom sql to manually set the new value in the database? I've also
> tried to restart bacula, but that hasn't helped, either.
>
> All the best & thanks in advance for your help,

In bconsole, did you issue the reload command before issuing the update 
command?

-- 
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>