Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage
2013-02-06 05:23:21
On 2013-02-06 10:46, Jummo wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the answer.
>> But what about this then:
>> If you then want to do subsequent backups, you may need to move the
>> Virtual Full Volume back to your normal backup pool. Alternatively,
>> you can set your Next Pool to point to the current pool. This will
>> cause Bacula to read and write to Volumes in the current pool.
>>
>> So what would be the correct way to create VirtualFull's then?
>>
>
> You need two devices for your Storage, so Bacula can read from one
> volume loaded in one device and write simultaneously to an another
> volume in the same pool loaded in a second device. For Backup2Disk a
> Virtual
> Tape Library could be a solution.
How can a Pool be defined with 2 Storage devices?
The Pool defines:
Storage = ApolloFile
But you can't define 2 devices for 1 storage?
Any change to get an example? Cause the Virtual Full documentation is
not always as clear.
>
> Best Regards,
> Patrick
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|