On Tue, March 20, 2012 9:11 am, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 20/03/12 01:31, Dan Langille wrote:
>> I just saw this job move multiple volumes from the scratch pool into
>> another pool.
>>
>> That seems very odd.  Bacula 5.0.3? oh my.. I should upgrade.
>
> I've been seeing it for a while - Kern mailed a couple of weeks ago to
> say he thinks he knows what's causing it but there's no fix yet.

Thank you Mr Brown.  Good to hear from you.

>
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU233" from
>> 'Scratch' pool.
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU234" from
>> 'Scratch' pool.
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU235" from
>> 'Scratch' pool.
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU236" from
>> 'Scratch' pool.
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU237" from
>> 'Scratch' pool.
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU238" from
>> 'Scratch' pool.
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU239" from
>> 'Scratch' pool.
>> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: There are no more Jobs associated
>> with Volume "ETU033". Marking it purged.
>
> Were these all brand new tapes?

Me?  No, I rarely have those.  I'm sure these are old, old tapes.  But in
good condition.  I monitor the error rates and retire those with crap
results.

-- 
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users