Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Will Bacula be faster with Two Tape Devices?

2012-01-24 10:09:41
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Will Bacula be faster with Two Tape Devices?
From: "Bryan K. Walton" <bryan AT vidadiagnostics DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:37:14 -0600
Thanks for the reply, John.  I'll give it a go.  The spooling will be on
RAID 10, so I won't get the performance of RAID 0, but we will see how
it goes.

Cheers,
Bryan

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 17:59 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> > But will this speed up my backups?   Generally speaking, should Bacula be
> > able to write two the two tapes devices more quickly than it can write
> > to one?  The unit in question is a Tandberg Data StorageLibrary T24 LTO
> > with two serial attached scsi LTO4 tape devices, attached to a server
> > running Centos 6.2.
> 
> It will not speed up a single job since 1 job can not use more than 1
> drive however if you have concurrent jobs with spooling and you can
> provide enough bandwidth to keep up with the drives it can speed up
> multiple jobs. Remember that at 2:1 compression these LTO4 drives
> write at 120MB /s each so you will need to have a raid array (raid 0
> maybe) or fast SSD for your spool location and this raid probably
> should not be on the same drives as your source data.
> 
> John



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>