Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 14:22:46
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:20:40 -0500
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:38 PM, DMS <bacula-forum AT backupcentral DOT com> 
wrote:
> Right now I have all my backups going to a 6 TB raid array. I am trying to 
> keep the fulls on the array, and the Incrementals on another mounted 600 GB 
> storage drive. The storage directors and everything are setup correctly, jobs 
> run just fine, except that they are upgrading themselves to a full backup 
> instead of an incremental backup.
>
> So I guess my question is, should the job check against the catalog on a 
> client basis to see if there is a full backup? It seems to only be concerned 
> that there is not a full backup on the new Storage device instead of checking 
> to see if there are any fulls listed in the catalog (which there is a full 
> from last Friday).
>

It checks on a per job basis. Do you have more than 1 job for the same
file set on the same client?

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users