Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance with latent networks

2011-10-03 16:05:24
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Performance with latent networks
From: mayak-cq <mayak AT australsat DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 22:02:48 +0200
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 10:34 +0200, mayak-cq wrote:
<snip>



zurich and copenhagen are 22.589 ms apart on a shared 100mbit connection -- using the bandwidth delay product:

theoretical
bandwidth       delay        productBits         bitsPerByte      bytesInWindow
500 000 000 * .022589 = 11 294 50             /   8                =  1 411 813
--^^^^^^^
this should be 100 000 000 -- therefore

theoretical
bandwidth       delay        productBits         bitsPerByte      bytesInWindow
100 000 000 * .022589 = 282 363             /   8                =     35 295

sorry for the confusion ...

m

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>