Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+

2011-09-22 10:03:07
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+
From: Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm AT users.sourceforge DOT net>
To: "R. Leigh Hennig" <rlh1533 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:00:51 +0400
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:30:10 -0400
"R. Leigh Hennig" <rlh1533 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

> watchdog/n
> ksoftirqd/n
> migration/n
> events/n
> kblocked/n
> cqueue/n
> aio/n
> ata/n
> kmpathd/n
> xfslogd/n
> ib_cm/n
> rpciod/n
> 
> Where "n" is some number between 0 and 23. Is this normal? Does this
> look right to you guys? Is something abnormal here? Thanks for your
> input,
These are kernel threads. They have nothing to do with Bacula.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>