Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+

2011-09-22 09:49:37
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+
From: Michael Galloway <gallowaymd AT ornl DOT gov>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:47:20 -0400
thats all quite normal for a system with a large number of cpu's. on my 48 core boxes, there are more than 700 processes running when its idling :-) this is just the system managing the IO/etc between the cpus and the other subsystems.

--- michael

On 09/22/2011 09:30 AM, R. Leigh Hennig wrote:
I have Bacula 5.0.2 installed and have a number of clients (15 in total) and
storage resources (5 total), and on the system that my director is installed
on has about 433 active processes. This seems very excessive. The vast, vast
majority of them are these processes:

watchdog/n
ksoftirqd/n
migration/n
events/n
kblocked/n
cqueue/n
aio/n
ata/n
kmpathd/n
xfslogd/n
ib_cm/n
rpciod/n

Where "n" is some number between 0 and 23. Is this normal? Does this look
right to you guys? Is something abnormal here? Thanks for your input,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>