Re: [Bacula-users] bacula + qnap (SAN)

Hi,

I’m not using any QNAP but other NAS devices and I prefer NFS because I can access the volumes from other devices that way. Turned out to be helpful for me. For example when the backup server has gone away.

Regards

Julian

Von: Arnau Coll :: Puntdoc [mailto:acoll AT puntdoc DOT es]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2011 17:09
An: 'Pietro Bertera'
Cc: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula + qnap (SAN)

I understand and I’m in the same way. All new vm’s are deployed in iSCSI volume on QNAP nas.

Next item to my wishlist is config a physical bacula with volumes in a QNAP. My question is, by NFS or iSCSI? Some partners told me to do in NFS, but I think that in iSCSI is the best way...

What do you think?

Thanks,

Arnau

De: Pietro Bertera [mailto:pietro AT bertera DOT it]
Enviado el: martes, 06 de septiembre de 2011 19:48
Para: Arnau Coll
CC: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula + qnap (SAN)

Hi,

2011/9/6 Arnau Coll <acoll AT puntdoc DOT es>

Hi,

What’s the best way to set up bacula with a Qnap SAN ? By NFS or iSCSI?

Thanks

I used a qnap as low-performance storage for bacula (on a VM) and others VMs, but I have connected the qnap to
ESXi host as an iSCSI storage, end then created the virtual disks over the new datastore.

best regards,
Pietro
--
Bertera Pietro
http://www.bertera.it

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop 
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users