I understand and I’m in the same way. All new vm’s are deployed in iSCSI volume on QNAP nas.
Next item to my wishlist is config a physical bacula with volumes in a QNAP. My question is, by NFS or iSCSI? Some partners told me to do in NFS, but I think that in iSCSI is the best way...
What do you think?
Thanks,
Arnau
De: Pietro Bertera [mailto:pietro AT bertera DOT it]
Enviado el: martes, 06 de septiembre de 2011 19:48
Para: Arnau Coll
CC: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula + qnap (SAN)
Hi,
2011/9/6 Arnau Coll <acoll AT puntdoc DOT es>
Hi,
What’s the best way to set up bacula with a Qnap SAN ? By NFS or iSCSI?
Thanks
I used a qnap as low-performance storage for bacula (on a VM) and others VMs, but I have connected the qnap to
ESXi host as an iSCSI storage, end then created the virtual disks over the new datastore.
best regards,
Pietro
--
Bertera Pietro
http://www.bertera.it