Hi,

I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for 
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I get 
an ugly perfomance (<10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool file 
system is too small - is this assumption right?

To get a bigger spool fs, there might be some options:
1) What is better: bigger spool fs or faster spool fs? So first option: 3,6 TB 
RAID0 with 12 SAS disks direct attatched vs second option: 2 or 3 120 GB SSDs? 
2) Does it make any sense to have a spool fs much bigger than the tape size? 
(LTO4 - 800MB, with compression up to 1,6 TB - so does it make sense to use a 
fs > 1,6 TB?) 
3) Specially with the SSDs - will I run in problems because of MTBF? Is anybody 
using SSDs for spool fs?

I have an autoloader with an SAS-LTO4 drive and I would like to get the drive 
to steam as fast as possible.

Thanks for you answers!
Regards, 
Frank

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by fes AT frankeseidel DOT de via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better 
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users