Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan back volumes

2011-07-28 06:41:29
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bscan back volumes
From: "Richard Marnau" <marnau AT giovannil-nord DOT de>
To: "'Konstantin Khomoutov'" <flatworm AT users.sourceforge DOT net>, <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:39:17 +0200
> > I did create a new database and did the same bscan, this one was
> > working. Job/volume/pool is set to 365 days in the pool
> configuration.
> >
> > Just wondering:
> > If the client "file retention" is still default and the pools "file
> > retention" is set, Which one will actually be in action? I guess the
> > shorter one (client default 60 days?)
> Oops, wrong link. See [1].
> 
> 1.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-
> users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net/msg42297.html


Thanks for the link - that is now explaining why the file index was deleted.
But what is the conclusion? Setting Client retention to a high standard or 
disable it completely (autoprune=no)?
Right now I do manage the retention through the pool (full-pool, diff-pool, 
inc-pool) and as far as I understand
this is not working reliable.

Cheers,

Richard




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>