Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan back volumes

2011-07-28 09:20:19
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bscan back volumes
From: Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm AT users.sourceforge DOT net>
To: "Richard Marnau" <marnau AT giovannil-nord DOT de>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:18:09 +0400
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:39:17 +0200
"Richard Marnau" <marnau AT giovannil-nord DOT de> wrote:

> > > Just wondering:
> > > If the client "file retention" is still default and the pools
> > > "file retention" is set, Which one will actually be in action? I
> > > guess the shorter one (client default 60 days?)
> > Oops, wrong link. See [1].
> > 
> > 1.http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT 
> > net/msg42297.html
> 
> Thanks for the link - that is now explaining why the file index was
> deleted. But what is the conclusion? Setting Client retention to a
> high standard or disable it completely (autoprune=no)? Right now I do
> manage the retention through the pool (full-pool, diff-pool,
> inc-pool) and as far as I understand this is not working reliable.
Unfortunately, I don't know how to conveniently combat this bug.
May be it's possible to create several client definitions for a single
client--one for each type of backup.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>