Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Verify Jobs

2011-07-15 12:19:55
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Verify Jobs
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:17:51 +0100
>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:28:40 -0300, Rickifer Barros said:
> 
> I'm running Verify Tests with the VolumeToCatalog list and nothing is making
> sense.
> 
> For example, I've configured my FileSet to use the MD5 signature and in the
> Verify Job I've also used MD5 but with the "verify=pins1" intentionally to
> see if it would fail, but it didn't. How you can see below, it says that is
> all right with the files even compare with a different algorithm. A few days
> ago I've tried do this with DiskToCatalog to compare the files of the
> Catalog with the client disk and it worked successfully, but now using on
> Tape with VolumeToCatalog, the results didn't seem reliable. Somebody here
> have had the same problem?

This looks like a minor bug -- it doesn't check that the signature algorithm
matches the verify= option.

Note however that VolumeToCatalog doesn't recompute any signatures (it just
compares the file attribute data in the volume and catalog).

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric 
Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup 
Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas, 
optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>