Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula interrupted by signal 11: Segmentation violation

2010-06-21 10:51:44
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula interrupted by signal 11: Segmentation violation
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: robert AT leblancnet DOT us
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:48:55 +0100
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:11:21 -0600, Robert LeBlanc said:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT 
> com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:25:04 -0600, Robert LeBlanc said:
> >>
> >> Our Bacula 5.0.2 SD is crashing, but all I'm seeing is "Bacula interrupted
> >> by signal 11: Segmentation violation". What can I do to get more 
> >> information
> >> about this. We are moving our clients to TLS, but it doesn't seem
> >> to correlate to the TLS clients.
> >
> > See "What To Do When Bacula Crashes (Kaboom)":
> >
> > http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/problems/problems/What_Do_When_Bacula.html
> >
> > __Martin
> >
> 
> I've had two crashes over the weekend, and all I got both times was
> (PID was different):
> 
> ptrace: No such process.
> /var/lib/bacula/4153: No such file or directory.

The second message is normal (it is a misfeature of gdb), but the "ptrace: No
such process" is surprising.


> I guess I'll have to run bacula through gdb to find out what is going on.

Yes, that's probably the best approach.  It allows gdb to take control as soon
as the segmentation violation occurs.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users