Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Odd behaviour with Verify Jobs

2010-03-05 16:14:19
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Odd behaviour with Verify Jobs
From: Daniel De Marco <ddm AT bartol.udel DOT edu>
To: bacula-users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:11:50 -0500
I just updated to 5.0.1 and I can confirm the problem is still present.

I also filed the report at:
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1524

Daniel.

* Thomas <thomas AT ic3s DOT de> [03/05/2010 13:13]:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> 
> i see the same behaviour on my systems,
> this problem exists since the "accurate backup" feature was implemented in 
> 3.0.0.
> (i don't know if this causes the problem, but it is  my favourite candidate 
> for that :) )
> 
> someone should file a bug report :)
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> Daniel De Marco schrieb:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've been using InitCatalog and Verify jobs to monitor my production
> > machines. This seems to work very well when there are modified files. 
> > However if a new files appears in one of the monitored directories then
> > all the files from then on will be reported at the same time as missing
> > and as new files with the same name/path/attributes...
> > 
> > I debugged this problem a bit and it seems to be due to the fact that
> > when bacula queries the DB for the file attributes one of the where
> > clauses is the FileIndex. If there are added or missing files the
> > FileIndex is no longer correct for all subsequent files and they are all
> > reported as missing and new. I think a possible solution would be to
> > tweak the local FileIndex variable when doing the Verify pass: so if a
> > file is new don't increment the FileIndex and if a file is missing
> > increment it anyway. In this way the proper FileIndex would be used in
> > the query and only "real" problematic files would be reported. 
> > 
> > Daniel.
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bacula-users mailing list
> > Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> 
> -- 
> [:O]###[O:]
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>