On 02/24/10 08:07, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
>>> I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>>
>> I ran into this problem when I first upgraded to 3.0.3.  It turned out
>> to be a configuration issue.  Make sure you have the desired level of
>> concurrency enabled in ALL applicable resources (i.e, you need "Maximum
>> Concurrent Jobs = 20" set for the SD both in your bacula-sd.conf file
>> AND in your bacula-dir.conf file).  If you have different values set in
>> different places, the *lowest* will end up being used.
> 
> Do I get it right, that you have multiple jobs using the same device 
> concurrently?

Yes indeed.  I back up all of my clients simultaneously, and the jobs
all run concurrently to the same storage device.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users