Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi Volume Archives

2009-12-14 16:48:02
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multi Volume Archives
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Richard Scobie <richard AT sauce.co DOT nz>, bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:45:18 -0500
> Also my original intent in posing the "10 LTO4 tape" example, was
> whether or not Bacula needed to read all previous tapes in a multi
> archive set, in order to restore files residing on a given tape.
>
> It would appear that this is not the case and it would go directly to
> the tape the files are stored on.
>

I believe this does require you having a valid catalog however as I am
not sure how well catalog recovery will go with the missing volume.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>