justAck wrote:
> Hi,
> I still have to learn bacula internals, but urgently need answer for
> question regarding fragmentation of restored file(s).
> 
> Perhaps someone did backup of heavily fragmented file (size: ~100G) and then
> restored it to clean XFS volume on idle box.
> What is more likely:
> a) result file will be most likely not fragmented on disk at all
> b) result file may become fragmented if <some condition>
> c) result file will be as fragmented as initial file was
> d) result file may be even more fragmented as initial file was
> 
> The problem is that copying of restored file is ~20% slower than expected
> (than other files), I doubt if bacula may be a reason of this slowdown (e.g.
> result of restore is very fragmented). 
> 
> Please advice.

You could also use defrag on xfs volume

xfs_fsr -t 10800 -vvvv /your_moint_point

-- 

     Bruno Friedmann

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users