justAck wrote:
> The problem is that copying of restored file is ~20% slower than expected
> (than other files), I doubt if bacula may be a reason of this slowdown (e.g.
> result of restore is very fragmented). 

Fragmentation is not a performance problem on Unix-like filesystems.
"Sparseness" is (see "Sparse file" in Wikipedia).

A sparse file becomes ordinary file if restored.

-- 
Tullio Andreatta
09:f9:11:02:9d:74:e3:5b:d8:41:56:c5:63:56:88:c0
45:5f:e1:04:22:ca:29:c4:93:3f:95:05:2b:79:2a:b2

Disclaimer: "Please treat this email message in a reasonable way, or we
     might get angry" ( http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers )


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users