Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Better way to garbage collect postgresql database

2009-03-19 14:37:19
Subject: [Bacula-users] Better way to garbage collect postgresql database
From: Hemant Shah <hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com>
To: baculausers <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Folks,

This is a database question, but I figured some of the bacula users may have 
come across this problem so I am posting it here.


Every monday I run following commands to check and garbage collect bacula 
database:

dbcheck command
vacuumdb -q -d bacula -z -f
reindexdb

Usually I purge one or two backup volumes and the above commands run in less 
than 20 minutes. 

Before my monthly Full backup I delete large amount of data from the database 
as I delete one month worth of Full and Incremental backups. When I run the 
above commands after the Full backup, the vacummdb command take 12 hours to 
run. Is there a faster/better way of doing it?

My database is about 9GB.

If I backup database using pgdump and then restore it, will it do the same 
thing as vacuumdb and reindexdb commands?

Thanks.

Hemant Shah
E-mail: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com


      

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users