>>>>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:05:03 -0500, Brian McDonald said:
> 
> On Tuesday 03 March 2009 3:50:31 pm Dan Langille wrote:
> > Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:24:36 -0500, Dan Langille said:
> > >> Folks:
> > >>
> > >> A patch has been proposed for the FreeBSD rc.d script.  If you can test 
> > >> this and let me know if it works for you:
> > >>
> > >>    http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/132286
> > > 
> > > You may want to raise a new pr for this, but maybe the numbers 9101 etc 
> should
> > > be set from @dir_port@ etc during configure like with
> > > scripts/bacula-ctl-dir.in etc in the Bacula source code?
> > 
> > That is a very good idea.
> > 
> > I am not sure how to do that based on files/bacula-dir.in being outside 
> > the bacula source directory.
> 
> You would probably need to reverse the source of 'truth' for the port 
> numbers.  
> The port's Makefile would have a BACULA_DIR_PORT= parameter which would then 
> be set in the .in startup scripts, and also applied to the configure 
> arguments as needed.  Then, the configure process in the source files would 
> propogate that setting out to the rest of bacula as needed.

Yes, good point.  There is currently no way to set the port numbers when
building the FreeBSD port anyway.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users