On Tuesday 03 March 2009 3:50:31 pm Dan Langille wrote:
> Martin Simmons wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:24:36 -0500, Dan Langille said:
> >> Folks:
> >>
> >> A patch has been proposed for the FreeBSD rc.d script.  If you can test 
> >> this and let me know if it works for you:
> >>
> >>    http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/132286
> > 
> > You may want to raise a new pr for this, but maybe the numbers 9101 etc 
should
> > be set from @dir_port@ etc during configure like with
> > scripts/bacula-ctl-dir.in etc in the Bacula source code?
> 
> That is a very good idea.
> 
> I am not sure how to do that based on files/bacula-dir.in being outside 
> the bacula source directory.

You would probably need to reverse the source of 'truth' for the port numbers.  
The port's Makefile would have a BACULA_DIR_PORT= parameter which would then 
be set in the .in startup scripts, and also applied to the configure 
arguments as needed.  Then, the configure process in the source files would 
propogate that setting out to the rest of bacula as needed.

Brian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users