Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Offsite backup solution

2009-02-16 18:39:39
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Offsite backup solution
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Berend Dekens <berend AT cyberwizzard DOT nl>, bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:37:39 -0500
> I tried to get offsite backups by doing a local backup first to the
> local SD and then another backup to the remote SD. This works fine when
> backupping but when you need to recover data (and you are using
> incrementals or differentials instead of full backups) the SD which you
> told to perform the restore will most likely ask for backup volumes
> which are part of the remote pool and remote SD. For some reason it
> seems that bacula can't keep the pool data seperate so this way of
> offsite backupping won't work (unless I missed an option somewhere).
>
When I make 2 identical copies of the same data I use 2 separate
pools. So that in the case I can do incrementals and differentials on
the separate Fulls.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users