On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Miguel E. Chang Peña
<mchangp AT facinf.uho.edu DOT cu> wrote:
>> Have you created the bacula database?
>> And then started it?
>
>> All I can say is this is a rather old version of bacula and it has a
>> few known bugs but it is unlikely that you will hit them so this
>> version is fine for now.
>>
>> John
>>
>
> I have already created the bacula database and still does not work. It has
> 21 tables, and I think that is not the problem. What worries me the most
> is that "version error for database bacula. Wanted 9, got 10." Why is it
> telling me that? I have checked the configuration file, but I see
> everything is O.K. If you know something, please help me. Thank you a lot.
>

How did you install the software?

The reason I ask is that what this means is the catalog was created
with a script from a newer version of bacula than the version of
bacula that you are running. I believe  2.0.X installed a catalog
version 10. You can not downgrade a catalog so this will not work on a
system with 1.38.X installed.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users