On Monday 09 February 2009 17:09:19 Philipp Geschke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I dared to CC Kern... maybe he can enlighten us?
:-)
For me the problem has been solved for quite a lot time (I rewrote all 3rd
party GPL code that we used in the source). Unfortunately, the problem is not
yet resolved for Debian users, because the solution is in the development
code which is not yet released for "production". It is currently undergoing
beta testing, and hopefully it will be released in late March or April.
Best regards,
Kern
>
> John Goerzen schrieb:
> > Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> So it seems like openssl is already back in main repository. (I think
> >> it was in contrib before).
> >> Here are the bugs for debian. I don't see a bug for openssl support.
> >>
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=bacula
> >>
> >> What you are saying is that bacula should be compiled with with tls
> >> support? If yes we should submit a bug request.
> >>
> >> I'm cc'ing a maintainer.
> >
> > Please see NEWS.Debian.gz in the bacula-common package. This is
> > somewhat of a FAQ by now.
> >
> > The problem is not that the license for Bacula is non-free, or that the
> > license for OpenSSL is non-free, but that the two are not compatible.
> >
> > ISTR hearing from someone (Kern maybe) that the Bacula license may be
> > revised in the future to eliminate this problem.
> >
> > Note that README.Debian contains instructions to build your own bacula
> > with SSL/TLS support, which is a quite easy procedure.
>
> I didn't really dig into the issue itself, so I can't tell if it has been
> removed. I am refering to this post from Landon Fuller:
> http://www.adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2008-08/msg00634.html
>
> It is all about this:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00144.html
>
> Wether or not the package is compiled with tls support is really up to the
> maintainer, but in Debian Etch it was (The version used in Sarge did not
> have tls support).
>
> My understanding was, that Kern changed the Bacula code to solve the
> problem.
>
> I think a lot of people are using the Debian packages, either in Debian or
> in Ubuntu, and this could really become annoying, if unnecessary.
>
> --
> Philipp
>
> > -- John
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Lucas
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Philipp Geschke <bacula AT pgmail DOT
> >> net>
wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I asked basically the same thing a while ago:
> >>> http://www.adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2008-08/msg00517.html
> >>>
> >>> Back then I was told, that the issue had been removed, but the Debian
> >>> project seems to not have noticed this.
> >>>
> >>> Basically, while asking about Ubuntu, this really is a Debian Lenny
> >>> problem, meaning that a lot of people will have a lot of fun starting
> >>> this very weekend.
> >>>
> >>> Since I don't think that filing a bug report or talking to somebody
> >>> will get the release changed before Feb. 14th, all you can do is, sit
> >>> back, go with the recompiling or compile a current version by hand, and
> >>> enjoy the show. But feel free to contact whoever you like anyways.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Even though I have to ask: If Kern was in ongoing discussion with the
> >>> debian-legal list about the license issue, how come they never heard of
> >>> it being resolved?
> >>> Or did I get this part of the story wrong?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Philipp
> >>>
> >>> Bill Merriam schrieb:
> >>>> It appears Debian still doesn't distribute bacula packages with
> >>>> encryption enabled. Is there any news on that?
> >>>>
> >>>> There are instructions included with the debian package source on how
> >>>> to rebuild it with encryption. Has anybody done that and made the
> >>>> packages available?
> >>>>
> >>>> I am trying to figure out how to use the debian package building
> >>>> system. If I succeed in building encryption enabled binary packages
> >>>> should I distribute them somehow?
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>-------- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with
> >>>> Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use
> >>>> existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging
> >>>> applications that combine the power of local resources and data with
> >>>> the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to
> >>>> start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Bacula-users mailing list
> >>>> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> >>>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>------- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with
> >>> Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use
> >>> existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging
> >>> applications that combine the power of local resources and data with
> >>> the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to start
> >>> building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Bacula-users mailing list
> >>> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
