On Oct 8, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Joe Mannuzza wrote:

> Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Joe Mannuzza wrote:
>>>
>>> Has anyone had issues doing a restore of large sets of data via  
>>> bacula?
>>> Specifically, has anyone also noticed the process taxing the CPU?
>>
>>
>> Can you be more specific regarding these processes?
>>
>> At what stage of the backup does the CPU get taxed?
>>
>> It is normal for the tree building phase to require lots of CPU
>>

> Dan,
>
> Thanks for the response.  I am unsure at what stage it gets bogged  
> down.  Is there a way to check after the fact?

Not that I can think of.

>  Also, there were many backups going on at the same time of the  
> failure- around 40.  Server info: 2 Xeon 5150 @2.66 gigs, 3 gigs of  
> RAM.

Is that normal?  Do you usually run 40 concurrent backups?

>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
-- 
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users