terryc wrote:
> Ronald Buder wrote:
>
>
>> Just a few thoughts from us. Opinions welcome, maybe we are just
>> approaching this entirely wrong. However the environment here looks
>> somewhat like the scenario described above. We run plenty of Windows
>> Server boxes, Solaris and Linux, and for the exotic part AIX and HP-UX.
>> The Windows boxes being setup similarily usually require C: and a bunch
>> of important directories to be backed up as well as database folders,
>> webserver content folders and the likes.
>>
>
> If I'm understanding you correctly, and my limited experience with
> Bacula is correct, can I suggest a different mindset. One more fileset,
> than OS/boxen orientated.
>
Hey, that's pretty much what we're doing at the moment. We usually have
a "System"-job taking care of all the operating system files and one or
more "data"-jobs to backup the application data. What we though would be
nice was to have a fileset template, just like the Job Definition. Some
sort of blanko fileset so to speak.
Maybe that clarifies it a bit...
Thanks for the answer though.
Best regards,
Ronald
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|