Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Jobs (shouldn't be)
2008-10-06 09:29:25
Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk> writes:
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
>
>> This directive is only implemented in version 2.5 and later. When
>> set to {\bf yes} (default {\bf no}), this job may run even if lower
>> priority jobs are already running. This means a high priority job
>> will not have to wait for other jobs to finish before starting.
>> The scheduler will only mix priorities when all running jobs have
>> this set to true.
>
> There are some jobs which _must_ run exclusively for whatever reason.
>
> BackupCatalog is one of them.
>
> If you allow mixed priority jobs to run simultaneously, you also
> need some way of flagging a job as "exclusive"
this is accomplished by not setting Allow Mixed Priority on
BackupCatalog.
(also, you should set BackupCatalog to have a unique priority among
the jobs in your configuration -- but this is true regardless of
whether Allow Mixed Priority is set or not.)
--
regards, | Redpill _
Kjetil T. Homme | Linpro (_)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|