Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Jobs (shouldn't be)

2008-10-06 08:26:57
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Jobs (shouldn't be)
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho AT linpro DOT no>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:47:59 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:

>    This directive is only implemented in version 2.5 and later.  When
>    set to {\bf yes} (default {\bf no}), this job may run even if lower
>    priority jobs are already running.  This means a high priority job
>    will not have to wait for other jobs to finish before starting.
>    The scheduler will only mix priorities when all running jobs have
>    this set to true.

There are some jobs which _must_ run exclusively for whatever reason.

BackupCatalog is one of them.

If you allow mixed priority jobs to run simultaneously, you also need some
way of flagging a job as "exclusive"

AB



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>