On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Tyler J. Wagner <tyler AT tolaris DOT com> 
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We store backups on a filesystem, named for the hostname and backup level:
> server1-Full-0001
> server1-Full-0002
> server1-Differential-0001
> server1-Differential-0002
> server1-Incremental-0001
> server1-Incremental-0002
> server1-Incremental-0003
> ...
>
> Since upgrading from Bacula 1.37 to Bacula 2.2, these files are no longer
> named sequentially for each file in series, but instead for the MediaID:
>
> server1-Full-0013
> server1-Full-0067
> server1-Differential-0023
> server1-Differential-0113
> server1-Incremental-0015
> server1-Incremental-0098
> server1-Incremental-0147
> ...
>
> Not that it matters much, but it was nicer to look at the old way.  How do I
> restore the old behaviour?
>
Without modifying the code you can not do this. The new behavior is a
bugfix for the case that volumes were deleted it was possible for
bacula to want to assign an already used label to a new volume.

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users