On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Win Htin <win.htin AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Yes. Following is the output:
> (Please note for security reasons I changed the hostnames and IP addresses
> in my emails)
>
> [win@client01 ~]$ ping baculaserver
> PING baculaserver (192.168.12.44) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from baculaserver (192.168.12.44): icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=8.79 ms
> 64 bytes from baculaserver (192.168.12.44): icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=8.82 ms
> 64 bytes from baculaserver (192.168.12.44): icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=8.72 ms
>
Sorry to ask that twice. I should have been more clear in my first
reply, so I would not have make sure you did the right thing..

You have no other reason why port 9101 would be blocked on baculaserver.

I wonder is the director listening on localhost or 127.0.0.1 and not
on the external interface? Are you sure that the director does not use
127.0.0.1 or localhost in the configuration files?

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users