> In the above example both hosts would have two drives attached to them so
> each host would be running a storage daemon.
I missed that sorry. You are doing this for performance reasons?

>Only one of the hosts has the
> controller connected to it so host1 would be the only one that could send
> commands to the changer.  I understand that I can setup ssh commands to send
> mtx to the other host.  I was just providing an example  to see if something
> like this could be possible in the future and see if anyone else would be
> interested.  If it could be easily implemented I'd love to see it in a
> future version of bacula.  If it isn't then I'll try to cobble something
> together to get me by.
>
I believe this would require a lot of changes in the code especially
if we are going to allow sending jobs to the changer device and
letting it pick a drive and storage daemon to use.


You could submit this as a feature request however I suspect this will
be a low priority item.

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users