--- On Mon, 7/7/08, Mark V <mvyver AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

> From: Mark V <mvyver AT gmail DOT com>
> Subject: [Bacula-users] bat installation: to be expected or not
> To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> Date: Monday, July 7, 2008, 8:56 PM
> Hi Group,
> I've compiled and installed bacula 2.4.0 and 2.4.1.b2
> on openSUSE 11.0.
> All proceeded except for the installation of bat.
> The bat conf file seems to be copied to the install
> directory, but not bat.
> Is this expected?
> 
> The following thread from March '08 mentions the same
> issue, but there
> was no unambiguous resolutions, i.e. should this be
> reported as a bug?
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=120660407720437&w=2
> 
> Cheers
> Mark
> 

This problem exists in 2.2.8 and 2.4.0. I had to manually copy bat and bat.conf 
file.

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE
> NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open
> source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for
> chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at
> http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Hemant Shah
E-mail: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com



      

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users