[Bacula-users] bat installation: to be expected or not
2008-07-07 21:56:54
Hi Group,
I've compiled and installed bacula 2.4.0 and 2.4.1.b2 on openSUSE 11.0.
All proceeded except for the installation of bat.
The bat conf file seems to be copied to the install directory, but not bat.
Is this expected?
The following thread from March '08 mentions the same issue, but there
was no unambiguous resolutions, i.e. should this be reported as a bug?
http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=120660407720437&w=2
Cheers
Mark
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] bat installation: to be expected or not,
Mark V <=
|
|
|