Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] 2.4.0 to 2.2.7 archive integrity

2008-07-05 15:31:43
Subject: [Bacula-users] 2.4.0 to 2.2.7 archive integrity
From: "Michael Short" <mdshort AT gmail DOT com>
To: "Bacula Users" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 14:31:36 -0500
Today I am questioning the integrity of a backup archive created for a
full backup. We created the backup with the intention of an easy
restore (though we did have other means to recover data). However,
when we proceeded to run the restore, numerous archive errors were
found. First we had checksum errors, then the restore failed. The only
way to recover what was left was to use bextract with the -p argument.

The backup was made from a Windows 2003 SBS to a local usb drive. The
windows machine was running the FD and SD version 2.4 and the director
was running 2.2.7. Though I am willing to bet that this was just a
freak accident caused by unusual circumstances (and perhaps a faulty
usb drive.)

We only had one problem doing the restore and that was bextract
inability to strip windows paths from backups. Bextract should feature
all the regex and recovery options that are available via bacula.

My question is, is there a way to check the integrity of bacula
archives? I have made full backups to this usb drive before and I am
unsure if this was an isolated incident.

Sincerely,
-Michael
-- 
Michael Short
Securenets
(901) 233-9926

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>