BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

2016-05-15 06:44:06
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4
From: Raoul Bhatia <raoul AT bhatia DOT at>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 12:23:40 +0200
On 15.05.2016 11:29, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> Il 14/05/2016 22:19, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
>> On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>>>> It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't 
>>>> you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then and just 
>>>> leave the original project intact?
>> I appreciate the idea to try and contact Craig Barret - that is homework
>> to be done in preparation of such a decision. Maybe Mauro is too
>> pessimistic about getting a response - Craig has done an admirable job
>> in creating BackupPC, why should he not have interest in an initiative
>> that tries to keep it alive?
> My pessimism spawn from fact he didn't answer to previous messages,
> but You may be right (at least I hope You are!)
> Most likely previous e-mails simply failed to reach him, which means
> he probably does not read the ML or the old mail address.
> This is the first stumbling block: which address to use?
> I found a couple of references (https://plus.google.com/101485295906215538714
> and https://www.linkedin.com/in/craig-barratt-11302a65), but no explicit 
> e-mail.
>
> if anyone has (or finds) a reasonably recent address please share.
> I can be reached directly at mc5686 AT mclink DOT it and I am on 
> Freenode/#backuppc,
> in case we do not want to spam sensitive data on a public ML.

Hi!

First, I would be very happy if BackupPC 4 would continue and would
again pick up more speed.
Thanks to all who are driving this!
Happy to help as my limited time allows.

Second, maybe we have some Googlers lurking on this list who might know
a better way to reach out to Craig?
Also, from my experience in another global corporation, I suggest to add
a "ACTION REQUIRED: "-prefix to the email subject
and split the email body into two sections: One short "exec summary" and
then the in-depth details afterwards.
>>From my experience, this will help a lot.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc.  |  Email. raoul AT bhatia DOT at  |  Mobile. 
+43.699.10132530  |   Web. http://raoul.bhatia.at/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/