On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Alex Clifford <alex.c AT axxin DOT com> wrote:
> I'm currently at ~400GB and the rsync -H seems to take around an hour with
> 1GB to sync. I'll see how it goes when larger amounts of data are added.
> I've set the BackupsDisable configuration option to be 2 on the DR system so
> I can view the web interface and complete restores but not have my DR data
> altered. Thanks for your suggestion; I'll investigate something like that
> further if my rsync speed becomes troublesome.

The number of hardlinks in the pool matter more than the total size of
the data in terms of being a problem for rsync so keeping a longer
history can cause trouble too.   However, the next version of backuppc
may solve this problem and be more rsync-friendly.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/