Re: [BackupPC-users] remote/multi access danger?
2010-12-14 11:56:39
Les Mikesell wrote at about 10:09:41 -0600 on Tuesday, December 14, 2010:
> On 12/14/2010 9:39 AM, gregwm wrote:
> > "pull" is fine for most circumstances, but i have an instance where
> > "push" is the only option. assuming i don't run nightly or trashclean
> > remotely, any danger in mounting the backuppc volume via sshfs and
> > running BackupPC_dump?
>
> That doesn't sound even close to being reasonable. How about running
> ssh with a port-forwarding tunnel that the server can use after the
> client originates the connection? Or perhaps a VPN like openvpn that
> you connect as needed?
>
Last time I checked 'sshfs' won't even work because it doesn't handle
hard links properly. It only 'imitates' a filesystem - it doesn't
provide all the capabilities of a file system necessary for backuppc
to work (unless sshfs has changed in the past year or two)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|