Re: [BackupPC-users] Are all non-zero length files in the pc tree stored

BackupPC-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BackupPC-users] Are all non-zero length files in the pc tree stored in the pool?

2010-12-09 20:41:24

Subject:	Re: [BackupPC-users] Are all non-zero length files in the pc tree stored in the pool?
From:	Craig Barratt <cbarratt AT users.sourceforge DOT net>
To:	"Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:39:02 -0800

Jeffrey writes:

> But I also wanted to confirm that this holds true not just for normal
> files but for links (soft & hard) and other special files.

Yes, all non-empty files should be pooled (including hard links, soft
links, char/block special files and attribute files).

Craig

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[BackupPC-users] Are all non-zero length files in the pc tree stored in the pool?, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky Re: [BackupPC-users] Are all non-zero length files in the pc tree stored in the pool?, Craig Barratt <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [BackupPC-users] Bizarre form of cpool corruption., Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
Next by Date:	Re: [BackupPC-users] Filesystem corruption: consistency of the pool, martin f krafft
Previous by Thread:	[BackupPC-users] Are all non-zero length files in the pc tree stored in the pool?, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
Next by Thread:	[BackupPC-users] Cloning the BackupPC filestore to a removable drive, hansbkk
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]