On 1/27/2010 2:26 PM, Chris Robertson wrote:
>> Package managers are different on both. CentOS uses the RPM (Redhat Package
>> Manager), while Debian uses APT. I think APT works much better. Debian
>> definitely resolves dependencies much better than others.
>>
>
> CentOS uses YUM (Yellowdog Updater, Modified) for package management.
> Saying CentOS uses RPM is like saying Debian uses dpkg.  While I would
> certainly agree that APT is a better package manager than RPM, I prefer
> YUM to APT.  Your mileage may vary.

While I generally use and prefer CentOS myself and don't care that much 
about the differences in the package management tools, there are 
differences in the way the package repositories are handled that are 
probably better on the ubuntu side.   With CentOS, the base repositories 
have very little beyond what is in RHEL and 3rd party repositories must 
be used for anything else.  However, there is no real coordination among 
the several 3rd parties so if you use more than one you are likely to 
have conflicts in the package dependencies.  Ubuntu seems much more 
coordinated in terms of including the repository configurations in the 
base install and having most packages you are likely to want available 
in these repositories where required component revisions always match.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/