Re: [BackupPC-users] Problems with hardlink-based backups...
2009-09-01 00:20:53
Jim Leonard wrote:
> Peter Walter wrote:
>
>> Perhaps - but a very close second. Backuppc is very stable and robust.
>> But, disasters do happen. I have had my grits saved at least twice by
>> having a remote backup of the backup server (remember Katrina and New
>> Orleans?) and I am very nervous about using a backup technology that
>> cannot be replicated properly without physical access.
>>
>
> There's nothing wrong with wanting a DR plan for your backup system.
> However, expecting/requiring the backup system to work across all
> implementations is unrealistic. Each site is different, hence each DR
> plan must be created by that site, not by the software that site uses.
>
In my case, "the software that the site uses" is backuppc. There is only
one implementation. What I have asked for is a disaster recovery method
for recovering backuppc servers. Holger has kindly promised to write /
create a few scripts to do exactly that, when he has the time. I am
hopeful that the scripts he creates will be integrated into backuppc -
since I think it would be nice for backuppc to be able to backup other
backuppc servers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|