BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] How to reuse already saved data until an interrupted incr backup

2009-07-05 17:17:26
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] How to reuse already saved data until an interrupted incr backup
From: Matthias Meyer <matthias.meyer AT gmx DOT li>
To: backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:10:54 +0200
Les Mikesell wrote:

> Matthias Meyer wrote:
>> Matthias Meyer wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I use BackupPC 3.1 and rsyncd.
>>> If an incr Backup aborts, e.g. because of lost network connections, all
>>> of the data, which was copied into the /new directory, will be deleted.
>>> The next time an incr backup runs, all the work (compare and transfer)
>>> must be done again.
>>>
>>> What is the reason for this behavior?
>>> Is there a posibility to save the already saved data and reuse it for
>>> the next backup in a similiar way as in interupted full backups?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> Matthias
>> 
>> I tried to move the data (/new, /NewFileList, /XferLOG.z) to another
>> place by the DumpPostUserCmd if $type == incr and $xferOK == 0.
>> This part works fine.
>> In the DumpPpreUserCmd I move the data back to its original place if
>> $type == incr and saved data exists.
>> This part works fine too.
>> But the following rsync process transfers the already transfered files
>> again.
>> It seems that rsync, at least within an incremental mode, did not compare
>> the files against the /new directory.
>> 
>> In the next step I will try to move the /new directory to a /<number>
>> directory, update the /backups file and run BackupPC_link during the
>> DumpPostUserCmd.
>> 
>> Is there any reason to not do that?
> 
> Rsync incrementals are based on the previous full unless you are using
> incremental levels, so even if the backup had completed it wouldn't be
> used for
> comparison in the next run.  If this is a frequent problem for you,
> perhaps you
> should make all of the backups fulls.  This will take longer because of
> the
> checksum comparisons but not much more bandwidth.  Then partial backups
> would be reused and you would not transfer multiple copies of files for
> each incremental.
> 
Yes I know. I use incremental levels (because I do not understand any
advantage of not using it ;-)

br
Matthias
-- 
Don't Panic


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/