Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files
2009-06-14 05:30:39
Matthias Meyer skrev:
-----
incr backup started back to 2009-06-13 10:59:37 (backup #341) for
directory data Connected to eddie:873, remote version 29
Negotiated protocol version 28
Connected to module data
Sending args: --server --sender --numeric-ids --perms --owner --group -D
--links --times --block-size=2048 --recursive -D . . Checksum seed is
1244886594 Got checksumSeed 0x4a337642
Got file list: 11348 entries
Child PID is 13925
Xfer PIDs are now 13925
Sending csums, cnt = 11348, phase = 0
create d 700 4294967295/4294967295 4096 .
create d 0 4294967295/4294967295 0 2c8
create d 700 4294967295/4294967295 0 2c8/Bliwa
create d 700 4294967295/4294967295 0 2c8/Bliwa/data
create d 700 4294967295/4294967295 0 2c8/Bliwa/data/log
pool 700 4294967295/4294967295 48
2c8/Bliwa/data/log/log.ctrl
pool 700 4294967295/4294967295 1048576
2c8/Bliwa/data/log/log3.dat
pool 700 4294967295/4294967295 48
2c8/Bliwa/data/log/logmirror.ctrl
create d 700 4294967295/4294967295 81920 2c8/Bliwa/data/seg0
pool 700 4294967295/4294967295 8192
2c8/Bliwa/data/seg0/c10.dat
...
-----
Also noticeable is the line: "incr backup started back to 2009-06-13
10:59:37 (backup #341) for directory data" above. Does this mean this run,
342, is "compared" to 341?
Yes
And if so, would that explain this behaviour?
What do you mean?
My thought here was that the files not backed up in run 341 was instead
backed up in run 342 just because they weren't in 341 and not because
any attribute has changed. My intuition told me that an incremental run
should be compared to the latest full, and not the latest incremental
as it seems in this case. That's why I reacted to this line in the log.
Skipped files in 341 is marked "pool" in 342.
You are sure that nothing was changed at this file(s) (timestamps,
attributes, owner)?
e.g. pool 700 4294967295/4294967295 48 2c8/Bliwa/data/log/log.ctrl
have access-rights 700
owner 4294967295
group 4294967295
size 48 bytes
Yes. Same file from 341:
skip 700 4294967295/4294967295 48 2c8/Bliwa/data/log/log.ctrl
And I think also it's not very likely that all files have changed that wasn't backed up in the last run.
Do you use --time as rsyncd parameter?
Yes, if you mean --times, see head of log example above.
As I said before, the $Conf{IncrLevels} is set to blank. To have a
"null" value for this parameter is not described in the documentation,
afaik,
so I'm a bit suspicious about that. I tried to set the IncrLevel to 1
and now I have a perfect behaviour in my tests. Also, in the summary
for the incremental runs above the level has the value
"ARRAY(0x8948138)" which doesn't make any sense to me. Here is the full
table:
Backup# Type Filled Level Start Date
Duration/mins Age/days Server Backup Path
336 full yes 0 7/6 11:30 223.6
7.0 /var/lib/backuppc/pc/eddie/336
337 incr no ARRAY(0x8947f0c) 10/6 11:32 8.0 4.0
/var/lib/backuppc/pc/eddie/337
338 incr no ARRAY(0x8947f0c) 11/6 11:32 173.9
3.0 /var/lib/backuppc/pc/eddie/338
339 incr no ARRAY(0x8947ee8) 12/6 11:35 12.9
2.0 /var/lib/backuppc/pc/eddie/339
340 incr no ARRAY(0x89480e4) 12/6 21:07 223.2
1.6 /var/lib/backuppc/pc/eddie/340
341 incr no ARRAY(0x8948138) 13/6 10:59 7.3 1.0
/var/lib/backuppc/pc/eddie/341
342 incr no ARRAY(0x8948138) 13/6 11:16 175.2
1.0 /var/lib/backuppc/pc/eddie/342
So it seems the IncrLevel parameter solves this for me but I have to
run some real backups to verify that.
Thanks
/Erik
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Erik Hjertén
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Matthias Meyer
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Matthias Meyer
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Matthias Meyer
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Erik Hjertén
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Matthias Meyer
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files,
Erik Hjertén <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Matthias Meyer
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Erik Hjertén
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Matthias Meyer
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Adam Goryachev
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup takes all files, Adam Goryachev
|
|
|