BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-03 01:24:27
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD
From: "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:20:43 -0400
Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009:
 > clint woodrow wrote:
 > > 
 > > Matthias Meyer wrote:
 > >> rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file
 > >> (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive
 > >> one new mail at sunday. rsync will only transmit this one new mail.
 > >> 
 > >> 
 > >> And you need a client on windows side. You can use cwRsync or rsync
 > >> within a cygwin environment.
 > >> 
 > >> br Matthias
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Thanks for the details Matthias.  I was wondering if one of you could
 > > confirm something else for me.  We've been testing BackupPC for the
 > > last few months.  The local backup server is up and running great and
 > > we're getting ready to put up an offsite backup server for redundancy
 > > and offsite security.
 > > 
 > > Up to this point, I've assumed I wouldn't be able to roll PSTs into
 > > the backups because they'd be too large to send over the limited
 > > bandwidth every night and that they'd take too much space in the
 > > pool.  From what Matthias has said, it looks like as long as we have
 > > the initial backup, subsequent backups shouldn't take nearly as long
 > > since rsync is sending changes only.  Can I also take from this that
 > > BackupPC won't be storing full copies for every backup?  i.e. If the
 > > user has a 1 GB pst and adds one message of 2k, the pool requirements
 > > are only 1 GB + 2k, not 2 GB + 2k?
 > 
 > No, rsync handles the transfer, so you will only transfer
 > (approximately) 2k for the changes. (Obviously there are additional
 > overheads for the non-changed sections, but they are very small).
 > However, once backuppc has the whole new version of the file, it will
 > add this 1.002G file to the pool, so the pool will consume 2G + 2k. Of
 > course, if you use compression, then the size of the cpool will be
 > smaller depending on how compressible your pst files are.
 > 
 
Said another way, BackupPC only does pooling and de-duplication at the
file level. To get the "1GB + 2k" you would need to pool at the block
level. Such block-level de-duplication would be nice for files that
grow such as log files or Inboxes, but it is not possible now with BackupPC.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises 
looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest 
innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and 
enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. 
Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>