BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-03 00:23:10
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD
From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:18:56 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Holger Parplies wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> clint woodrow wrote on 2009-06-02 19:50:08 -0400 [[BackupPC-users]  SMB vs 
> RSYNCD]:
 >> Can I also take from this that BackupPC won't be storing full copies for
>> every backup?
> No, as Adam has explained. If it's any consolation, there are also Linux MUAs
> (evolution) that consider mbox format such a good idea that they don't seem to
> support maildir format.

BTW, if it is any help, another possible solution is to not backup the
pst files, but use an IMAP compatible server, which uses maildir format,
and then you can backup the IMAP server. We do this in a few locations.

Regards,
Adam

- --
Adam Goryachev
Website Managers
www.websitemanagers.com.au
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEUEARECAAYFAkol+bAACgkQGyoxogrTyiULFgCfaVgnhhptIIZNkos5w0LeX/H1
i8oAmN1ki8s1o3k7rqmhyV9tRoceO0M=
=7jt9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises 
looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest 
innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and 
enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. 
Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>